Was everyone silenced to bring the Agniveer scheme? Will Agniveer scheme retired army officers also be proven traitors? Whatever happens in this country now? Agniveer’s Scheme Truth Reviled
Agniveer’s Scheme Truth Reviled
Will the Government of India allow the book of the former Army Chief of India to be published, how can it be possible that the former Army Chief gives the book to be published without prior permission, the news has been published in today’s Economic Times that the former Army Chief M.M. The government has not yet given permission to Naravane’s book Four Stars of Destiny to be published. The destiny of this book is now waiting for the government’s approval.
If a star is not put for permission to print it, this book will never see the sky. The former Army Chief has definitely shared its link so that you can buy it for ₹ 20.
You can buy the book. This book is being published by Penguin. MM Naravane gave the book to the publisher for printing without permission and the publisher also printed the book without completing the legal process. It does not seem that this would have happened if it has happened. So Army Chief MM Naravane should clarify this in the media that Whether permission was taken or not, is it possible that the secret of Agniveer scheme has been exposed, hence now some way has been found to stop this book from being published. You can ask where this news has not been published and where it has not been published. Why is this news not published? The Hindu
Times of India Indian Express Business Today Mint News based on excerpts from MM Naravane’s book has been published at many places. First its excerpt was released from news agency PTI. The headline is echoing that the Army itself was shocked by the Agniveer scheme; it had no idea that the second headline was about the confrontation with China in Ladakh, but in most of the places the Agniveer scheme was given prominence.
How was Agniveer scheme imposed on the Army?
Whereas during the protest, retired army officers were brought into the field to defend themselves and explain to the people that
At that time, some officers definitely protested, but their views were drowned in the noise of the Godi media. Now that the news about this book has been published in so many places, will the government stop its publication? The publisher must have printed copies, only then it will be in the media. Its excerpts were released. How much is at stake? On one hand, opposition MPs are being suspended en masse; on the other hand, former Indian Army Chief is getting permission to publish his book. Will wait for Godi Media will never raise the question whether the Army Chief’s book will be published or not or if it is published, that part of it will be removed which will now be published in the media.
Now wait, Godi Media now supports the former Army Chief or not, the same Godi Media remembers the Army Chief by showing the uniform of which you, the audience and the audience, were taught the lesson of patriotism and when people were asked questions, they were kept silent. Whether or not it protects the right to keep memoirs and write You will see the view. Don’t you find this news published in today’s Economic Times insulting? This news is telling that the sword of permission has hung. 2024 elections are ahead. How the Agniveer scheme was implemented from the back door, this question can become an issue. So is the election over?
Before this happens, will this book be allowed to be published or will this book never see the light of day. If you convert democracy into a rhythm, then permission for caution and relaxation will also be given on the orders of those who nowadays The big question is whether the Agniveer scheme was implemented by keeping the army in the dark. Naravane’s book removes the veil from the way of taking decisions about the army and shows that the decision maker is visible. He is not giving it anywhere even in the scene and the decision he is taking is also being implemented. We have not read this book.
I have read it but the parts I am talking about have already reached you through the media. It is clear from what has been written in the book that Agniveer’s plan was imposed from somewhere else and the army did not want that Agniveer should be removed after 4 years, rather Naravane writes that the army had suggested that after 4 years 75 FDI Agniveers should be kept in the army only. This was changed. After 4 years, only 25 FDI Agniveers will be kept in the army. This scheme broke the dreams of lakhs of youth to become soldiers in the army and improve their lives due to unemployment and helplessness. he it
It was destined that he would work for a few days only for 4 years but his heart was still set on serving the Army throughout his life. When this news reaches these youth and through the book of former Army Chief MM Naravane, then they will Kya Beetegi PTI has reported excerpts from the book before its release which shows that the armed forces were not aware of the government’s Agneepath scheme. Naravane was surprised by this proposal. He writes that the Army was surprised about this but for the Navy and Air Force it was a bolt out.
It was out of the blue, that is, like a sudden shock, the army not only advocated keeping 75-year-old Agniveer in the army but also demanded that he should get a better salary. In the proposal, initially only Rs 20,000 per month was to be given. Naravane It is written that this was unacceptable and after the intervention of the army it was increased to Rs 30,000. The government wanted to give only 20,000 rupees to Agniveer, but on the pressure of the army, it was increased to 30,000 rupees. The government was so worried that it would hire soldiers only on the daily wages of the army and soldiers. We do not know when this book will be published in the market, even if it will come.
The country will no longer have time to think about this because the storm of Ram Temple is going to blow in this country from January. You can’t even guess where the issue of unemployment and Agniveer will go and disappear.Can be imposed, but it is worth debating that
Why the Navy and the Air Force felt that the Agniveer scheme was a terrible blow?
Why has MM Naravane written this? If the Army itself did not know that such a decision was being taken, then Then who was taking this decision? The biggest thing that comes to the fore is that this scheme was launched by the government on behalf of the Prime Minister and on behalf of the Prime Minister’s Office.
This scheme, which was imposed in a way on all three armies, was not proposed by the army and was not their idea. As it was later shown, when this scheme was announced, all the Chiefs of Army, Air Force, Navy and Army were put forward and the CDS was put forward and an attempt was made to show as if these people had taken this decision. And they are defending this. Naravane Saheb has clearly said that he was the Army Chief at that time. He has said that he had given only one suggestion to the Prime Minister that around 5000 soldiers should be given the same terms and conditions as Short Service Officers.
On the same conditions as normal soldiers, around 10,000 to 60,000 soldiers are recruited in the Indian Army every year. The Prime Minister’s Office reversed this and said that the message that came from the Prime Minister was that the entire army, all the three armies In Navy, Army and Air Force, everyone should be recruited on a small scale as Agniveer Agneepath and their salary should be only Rs. 00, on which the Army said that this This is not acceptable. 00 is a very low salary for any soldier for 4 years, then after debate, the salary was increased to 0000 for Navy and Air Force.
So they were not at all prepared for that because the soldiers in the Air Force and Navy do very technical work, they do technical work so that airplanes can stay aloft, weapons can operate so that naval ships can stay aloft and If you cannot learn that technical work so quickly then All three armies opposed this and said that no, this should not happen, this was not the country’s decision, this was not a decision in favor of the army, this decision was a political decision which was imposed on the army and after which the army was put forward to defend the politician to do To defend the Prime Minister, to defend the government, the Army Chief was brought forward.
It was portrayed in the media in such a way that the Army has taken this decision if you 2020 If you see the news around June 14, 2020, you will feel in the Godi media that the Army has taken this decision and those who are opposing it are opposing the Army, whereas now this is clearly proved from the book of General Naravane. That this was completely wrong, this probably did not happen, this matter is not easy, when the book is published then it will be published to MM Naravane.
He should come in public and clearly explain what happened, according to PTI he has written in his book. That how can such a soldier be given the salary of a daily wage laborer, that too a soldier who has been trained and is expected to sacrifice his life for the country or a person who has retired from the post of Army Chief, you say. The former Army Chief cannot pay the salary of a daily wage laborer to the soldier.
He has written that in the beginning of 2020, he gave a proposal to the Prime Minister in the name of Duty, under which a limited number of soldiers could be recruited in the army, just like Some officers from PMO are taken on Short Service Commission. After some time of suggestion of Tour of Duty, this proposal got shelved after Covid and encounter in Galwan, Ladakh. PMO kept considering it with the idea of increasing its scope. In the PMO’s proposal, there was a plan to recruit the entire intake of the year together under short service whereas there was no such suggestion in Naravane’s tour of duty plan. Naravane writes.
When this proposal became a matter of the three armed forces, then CDS Chief of Defense Staff General Vipin Rawat had to take it forward, which the Army Lead Service
Naravane writes that it took a lot of time for Rawat to get the Navy and Air Force to agree to this proposal. The Army wanted that 75 percent of the recruits should be kept after 4 years. The Department of Military Affairs wanted 50 percent of the people should be kept for a further period. This scheme should be kept and implemented for 5 years for Godi Media and Hindi. News is not being allowed to reach Hindi readers through newspapers. Naravane’s book allows knowing how and with what thinking this scheme has been brought. Naravane writes that this model was introduced by the Chief of Defense Staff at the Prime Minister’s Home.
A meeting was held in November 2020 before the Defense Minister, Finance Minister, National Security Advisor, and Chiefs of Armed Forces and for the first time in this meeting, the words Agniveer and Agnipath were used. It was said that 50000 soldiers would be recruited and after the completion of the tour of duty, 25000 would be returned from the army and would be fired. Naravane writes that it was believed that this number was too small to bring any kind of change in the society because The objective of the scheme was to return disciplined manpower to the society, hence it was decided to send back 75 percent instead of 50 percent.
In the first proposal, it was suggested by the PMO that there should be retention in two phases, that is, 50 percent of the soldiers should be kept and 50 percent should be let go after 3 years. and 5 After a year, 25 FDI should be allowed to go, in this way only 25 FDI should be kept. According to PTI, Naravane has written that this was an impractical suggestion because six to eight months are spent only in basic training and deployment, apart from this, in the process of release. It also takes 6 months due to which the tenure of any soldier remains only about 2 years. There was a debate on this for some time and finally, a middle solution was found.
It was said that after 4 years, a certain number of soldiers should be kept in the army in one go, and the rest should be removed, Rahul Gandhi spoke openly about this plan, but Godi Media stopped his words from reaching him. Rahul had only one support, to speak in rallies. You can still go and watch the old recordings of Godi Media and old reporting. Jairam Ramesh tweeted. It has been said that such news cannot be minimized by the news of the suspension of the opposition. Former Army Chief Naravane has written in his memoirs that Agniveer is a surprise for all three parts of the army.
The decision was taken and they have also confirmed what we have been believing that the Agniveer scheme was brought without consultation. Those about whom the decision was to be taken were not even asked. When I raise this issue, they say that I am speaking against the army. I told you that he is a friend of the press, he also talks about them that look brother, you have understood, I am raising the issue of the army, I am saying that you used to give service for 15 years, used to give 8 Hajj to the youth, used to give pension, now you will not give. Earlier they used to give training for years
They used to give training, now you will give training for six months. Agniveer came up with the plan and I am talking against the army, I am protecting the army, I am respecting the army, so the Army Chief did not even know that such a plan was coming. Agniveer Yojana was brought by keeping the army in the dark. Retired officers from the army were also brought in after thinking, then I was targeted. Certainly, if the heads of the three wings of the army had gone to the government with their opinion, then it would have been The scheme is never implemented. A great injustice has been done to the village boys. Colonel Amit Kumar has written that there was a need.
You should have commented at the right time. We tried our best to make the government understand the matter but when we were intent on putting the last nail in our own coffin then what can anyone do? The silence of the army has done a great injustice. Nothing happens before the country. The plan was an attempt to infiltrate the politically brought-in army We had to fulfill the target as per the promise regarding employment in the manifesto. We remained silent so that our promotion was not affected. A huge loss has been caused but it can be rectified. All the veterans should be united in this matter. Anyone from the army of In the last 10 years, we have seen that the army is used in the propaganda of the government. The media is their spokesperson. Anyone who speaks against the government is declared a national enemy. Our social media accounts are banned. Hopefully, the government will remove this scheme.
Was everyone silenced to bring the Agniveer scheme? Will Agniveer scheme retired army officers also be proven traitors? Whatever happens in this country now? This scheme may have been announced when Manoj Mukund was the Army Chief in April 2022.
Agniveer Yojana comes into force after 2 months of retirement i.e. in June 2022. There is also a mention of the Chinese attack on the Ladakh border in the book of the Army Chief. Indian Express has published detailed news of PTI about this, which we also want to mention. Naravane writes that on the night of 31 August 2020, when Chinese tanks in eastern Ladakh Defense Minister Rajnath Singh started moving towards Rechan La Pass and told him to do whatever he thinks appropriate. That night, Defense Minister, Foreign Minister, National Security Advisor, Chief of Defense Staff
The conversation continued on the phone for a long time, that night The defense Minister told him that the Prime Minister had said that this was a purely military matter, and to do whatever you felt was appropriate, after Naravane wrote that I had a controversial situation, now with this freedom, all The responsibility was on me. He writes that I was in the Army House, and the map of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh was in front of me. I could imagine every unit and formation. We were prepared in every way but Did I want to start a war? Was the decision to go to war on such a big issue left to the Army Chief alone?
In the speeches, it is exaggerated and it is said that the army has been given a free hand, but such a free hand that they decide the future of the country, it should be thought that the responsibility of such a big decision was left on the army alone. This is what Naravane’s memoir says: What might have been troubling Naravane’s mind that night? It is written about what was going on that the country was in a bad condition, the Covid pandemic was going on, there was a bad impact on the economy, and the global supply chain was affected, if this situation had continued for a long time, would we have been able to ensure the supply of additional forces? Who at the global level
Our supporters are what will happen to the threat from China and Pakistan? 100 thoughts were running in my mind. He writes that he told Northern Army Commandant Lieutenant General YK Joshi that we cannot fire first. China will get an excuse to escalate the matter and accuse us of violence. The responsibility of thinking about so much has been put on the Army Chief whereas this work should have been done by the government. Its ministers should sit together and make political decisions. It was about who will come with India and who will not. Another thing which comes from the book of General Naravade
comes out clearly shows how close India and China were to war in 2020 In August 2020 when The Indian Army went to the Kailash hills to the south of Pong Sok to it can put some pressure on China, while the Chinese Army also sent its tanks, its armored vehicles, and its guns there to counter it. The soldiers also come face to face, at that time it seems that the only way to stop the Chinese soldiers is to stop the Chinese tanks, that the Indian Army starts shelling them and this fight starts at the moment when this decision
When the time came, General Naravane, as should be the Army Chief, the Defense Minister, the Prime Minister, the National Security Advisor, National Security Advisor Ajit Doble asked all these people, brother, what should be done, are we ready for the fight, so take some time. After this, India’s Defense Minister Rajnath Singh called him and asked him to do as he thought appropriate regarding the decisions that should have been taken by the government in foreign countries. The Ministry should have told whether America would come along or not or whether Pakistan would fight or not, the decision which Finance
The minister should have told us about our economic condition, can whether we go to war, the political decision should have been taken by the Prime Minister whether India could go to war with China or not, and all those decisions should have been left to an army chief. General Naravane fortunately left his Northern Army at that time. Told the commander that no, we do not want to fight a war, therefore we will not fire the first shot, you tilt the tanks downwards in front of China and let the Chinese soldiers come, if they fire first then we will fire, this is why
General Naravane has clearly said that there will be no war between India and China on 31 August 2020, but this decision could have been taken by some other Army Chief or some other person. He might have thought that brother, we The battle should be fought by someone else, but this decision cannot be taken by the Army Chief. Should the war between India and China, which are the two largest countries in Asia and the most important among the three countries of the world, be decided? This decision can be left to an Army Chief in which economic conditions, diplomatic conditions and rest international conditions are financial.
Conditions: This decision should be a political decision that should be taken at the highest level. This should be taken at the political level. It is very dangerous to leave it to an Army Chief and it will also be very dangerous for the future if in this way the political leadership just tells the Army Chief to do whatever he thinks appropriate We should be very worried about all this, we should be very upset that the political leadership of the Government of India is not taking a decision on this and is passing this decision on to other people, to the people below whom
In English, it is said that it is being imposed on those who are above their pay grade. It is being imposed on the Army Chief. The question is whether this book will be printed now. Even if it is not printed, has this book not done its job? How is Agniveer Yojana? This book exposes his secret. The reputation of the former Army Chief is also at stake. If his book is not allowed or it is said that the part of Agniveer should be removed, then what? Big veterans of the army will come with them, what will they do after coming, it is just a matter of a few days, everything will be clear, former army chief speaking on Agniveer scheme
How will history record the loneliness? I know you will also know, but the people who are intoxicated with religion have gone missing. If they do not know about themselves, then how will they know about history?