Nishikant Dubey filed an ethics complaint against Mahua Moitra. Mahua Moitra was silent expelled from the membership of the Lok Sabha.
Why Mahua Moitra expelled from Lok Sabha?
I Ask You One Thing You Don’t Even Tort Questioning Let Alone Descent The Spirit of Descent is Intel to India You Cannot Shake Yes Yes Duryodhana Dam You have come to tie me a big chain, what have you brought, when can he bind me? Those who are Sahib Masnad today will not be there tomorrow. Those who are Sahib Masnad today will not be there tomorrow. The caste is the tenant. The house is not small. Everyone’s blood is mixed in the soil here. Everyone’s blood is included here. There is a little Hindustan of someone’s father in the soil. Hello, I am Ravish Kumar. Mohua Moitra has been expelled from the Lok Sabha.
Former MP Mohua Moitra has been prefixed to her name and the decision from the investigation came so quickly that Mohua Moitra’s case should be taught to any judge before taking oath. BJP MP Nishikant Dubey filed an ethics complaint against Mahua Moitra on October 15. Filed a complaint in the committee and on December 8 the committee The report was placed on the table of the House, the report was presented at 12:00 noon and the debate started after 2 hours. The MPs read the 495-page Ethics Committee report and the judges from the High Court to the Supreme Court were also criticized for the speed with which they read it.
It should be known that Ethics is related to conduct and morals. The question of whether morality has done justice or injustice today is not in your control. When democracy is seen through the prism of religion, then it must be destroyed in the name of religion. Given that, can the whole matter be seen from the prism of constitution and morality, then how will you get the courage to see the reality of politics about which you know everything that every other MP would be doing the same but the punishment is not given to any one person. Mohua Moitra gets punishment Mohua Moitra could not even present her side inside the House and despite the growing voice of the majority
Meanwhile, she was silenced, expelled from the membership of the Lok Sabha, and out of the House, when Mahua was speaking, the opposition MPs stood with her, even after illness, Sonia Gandhi stood by the woman MP who was thrown out today, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has said that this is the murder of democracy. Most tenacious witch hunt of one of 78 Memon MPs a first timer a single woman with no political lineages elected from a far-flung constituency in Bangladesh.
The border I am 49 years old I will fight you for the next 30 years Inside Parliament Outside Parliament In the gutter on the streets etc Mang Hi Manvita Jad Hum Ke Hoi Sajan Harane Shane To Chita Tuli Will See The End Of You Don’t Wonder Punjab Sindh Gujarat Maratha Dra Utkal Bango You Don’t Have The Punjab Sindh Is Not Our draw is not yours Utkal is not yours Bango is not yours Where do you think you are going to rule us Where do you think you get this brute majority from India’s parliamentary democracy has today taken such a step on the path of history which rightly and decision to be wrong
There will be a debate on this matter for a long time. There will also be a debate on whether the mistake was big or whether the punishment was given big. Was there no haste in giving the punishment?
What else was said to BSP MP Danish Ali in the name of religion in this House?
But the decision did not come so soon. After more than three months, Ramesh Bidhuri has apologized to Danish Ali. Before Danish Ali’s case could be heard, Mohua Moitra’s hearing started while her case came to light later. The question is also that There has been debate on whether the Ethics Committee should have taken the decision in Mohua Moira’s case and scholars like PDT Acharya
It has been written extensively that the personality of Mohua Moitra is formed by those things which the masculine tradition of India can hardly tolerate. Mahua herself was made the enemy of Mahua. Some people noted her wearing big glasses and some noted her purse. The increase in the price of money, coming well dressed also made Mahua the enemy of Mahua. When the case of Mahua came to light, many articles came out regarding the fact that Mahua do not fit into that model where you make them objects of kindness by calling them beloved sisters or by speaking of motherly power and keep them locked in the house in the name of worship or keep quiet.
Get it done. Mohua breaks every tradition of being a woman, although she chants the names of Maa Durga and Maa Kali no less, you will keep looking at Mahua not from Mahua’s eyes but through the glasses made by men.
What has gone wrong or right with Mahua?
Many men in India cannot have the glasses to see this, this is the truth, that’s whyMahua is a lie, her glasses, her saree, her purse. It has been told in all these articles that she breaks the notion that a woman in India should only be married if she is divorced, widowed, or single, then she should not meet anyone openly. want or someone
She should not be seen with a man. She should not hold the hand of any man in public. Mahua breaks all these notions. Amrit Dhillon Samita Barua Ira Singh Prerna Dhoop Vandana While reading Dhoop’s articles, I am thinking that Mahua was punished for her mistake or Mahua was punished for being Mahua. Mahua’s daughter-in-law playing football in saree kicks that image of the daughter. Just like the ball returns back to the field even after being kicked, similarly the truth of politics also.
Has Mahua returned?
There is an irritation and that irritation was made because it was not seen that the one wearing the saree and the sun. How has Mahua Moitra, who wears glasses, managed parliamentary life in 2019 when many women from TMC Ever since she was elected as an MP, the Media has been looking for the glam factor in her? Mahua has said that I have come from a party on whose ticket 37 percent of women have won, but the media could not see beyond the glam factor in Mahua, she has been politicized in politics. The people of Krishnanagar, West Bengal knew that their Mahua was the same, with similar clothes and glasses. The people of Karimpur elected her as MLA in 2016. Mahua, who became MP for the first time in 2019, has a statement that I am fit.
I like to live, I want to present myself in my own style. The people of my constituency want me to look neat and clean. If I go wearing boring clothes, they say go wear shiny clothes. Ira Singh writes that to understand Mahua, it has to be understood through the prism of words like dignity and dignity. Her case shows that disobedient women will get what they deserve, both inside and outside the Parliament. Mahua’s English was not the only reason for irritation. Mahua’s words were also challenging that English which, after seeing the chair, turns into the language of street and slave. Mahua’s English is seen and heard playing the role of power.
Does Mahua’s English become the English of rebellion?
Mahua’s attendance in the Parliament is 85% while the average of the House is 79%. asked fewer questions but only by asking a few questions and speaking occasionally in debates Her video used to spread like wildfire. Today, the flag of dignity and dignity has been hoisted from the camp of those who used words like ’50 crore girlfriend’ and ‘Congress’ widow’. A woman MP has been expelled from the assembly. This is a dangerous situation. in India
It is the income of us to stand up to it. This was the speech of 25 June 2019 which resonated across the country. It was the first speech of the MP from remote Krishnanagar after studying in America and leaving her bank job at JP Morgan. They started downloading and forwarding on their mobile phones. Mahua had less time but in that very minute, she enumerated the dangers of democracy which no one was avoiding saying officially. She won with a huge majority. The harsh voice of this woman MP, who was roaring in front of the BJP, rubbed the ego of many people. Mahua started counting the seven symptoms of fascism.
Describing the first symptom, Mahua Moitra said that this nationalism is superficial and narrow. In the name of nationalism, there is blind nationalism which can become a threat to this democracy at any time. There is an insistence on dividing, not a competition to unite, Pehlu Khan. Citing the lynching of Ansari, Mahua said that human rights are being crushed at every level of the government, this is the second symptom of fascism. The third symptom is that the news media in India’s five big newsgroups are indirectly controlled by the government. TV
The channels are engaged only in propaganda of the ruling parties. There is no coverage of the opposition. Every lie is repeated so many times that it starts appearing true. This was Gobs’ formula. The fourth threat was that the ghost of national security has been raised. Mahua called national security a dark ghost, the fifth symptom of Mahua is That religion and government get mixed with each other, and people forget that they are also citizens. Mohua Moitra kept on speaking that day. The interruptions started increasing. After a minute, when the Speaker asked her to finish her speech, she said that my first
The speech is for two more minutes. Give me two more minutes. Today, when he was expelled from the Lok Sabha, his attitude was similar to the first speech. Lok Sabha Sun, the Weapon of Parliament Committee, Aaronic, the Ethics Committee, set up to serve as a Moral Compass for Members Established by Abu Ghazali Today we have never done anything to bulldoze the position and become another weapon to bring us into submission. This Committee and this Report have broken every rule in the book in essence.
You’re Finding Me Guilty of Breaching a Code of Ethics That Doesn’t Exist The Committee is Punishing Me for Engaging in a Practice That Is Routinely Accepted and Encouraged in the House The Recommendation of Experts is Based Solly on The Ground That I Have Shared My Lok Sabha Portal Login There are no rules whatsoever to govern the sharing of logins as the hearing of the Ethics Committee demonstrates that all of us MPs are conveying our belts to get questions from the public from citizens and to voice that in The first speech of Parliament, June 2019 turned Mahua into Mahua.
There was so much anger that it was alleged that he had stolen his speech from somewhere else, from the author’s article of which he was accused of stealing it.
It seems that he wrote in favor of Mahua by tweeting that Mahua has not stolen anything whereas Mahua said during the speech itself that I have taken all this information from a poster of the Holocaust Memorial Museum of America in 2017. Mamata Banerjee and Trinamool Congress Mahua is standing with Moitra. Mamata Banerjee has said that Mahua was not even allowed to speak in her favor. Mahua was expelled after only 30 minutes of debate. If the BJP cannot defeat us in the elections then it is doing politics of revenge, this is an acceptable insult to parliamentary democracy.
BJP feels that it has a majority so it can do anything but Mahua should return to Parliament with even bigger public opinion Really I am someone for democracy I think the Prime Minister must decide this common doubt Sad day for the Indian Parliament Politics BJP came and they killed the democracy and they ditched the people within half an hour. Every political party has been discussing for three minutes for two minutes and now they have taken a decision You Left 495 Pages and Didn’t Allow Even the Victims to Take Their Own Stand for Self Defense This Is Unfortunately Unfortunately
It is unacceptable It is injustice It is repairable And we will win the case Win the battle next and see if the people will give a fitting reply to BJP I believe Samajwadi Party President and leader Akhilesh Yadav said that the people of the ruling party Hire a consultant to recruit opposition MPs Due to which, the time of the ministers and the MPs and MLAs of the ruling party is not spent in conspiratorial activities but in the works of public interest. If the basis on which the membership of MPs is being taken is applied to the ruling party, then perhaps one or two of their MPs will be MLAs.
Some people will be left in the House. They prove to be more lethal for the ruling party on the road than in the House. Congress spokesperson Supriya Srinet has said that there is no fear that the Modi government sitting with such a huge majority will allow Mahua Moitra to speak for 10 minutes.
Why can’t she give permission? What are they afraid of saying? Everyone in the House will speak and make allegations, but the one against whom there is an allegation
Who is being expelled from the House cannot speak?
What kind of justice is this? Rahul Gandhi’s membership was lost and then reinstated. Rahul Gandhi, It is said that Mahua Moitra, who was punished for speaking on Adani, has been very aggressive about the Adani issue.
Even the report gets published. She tweets before any other leader. The media does not even touch Mahua’s tweet. Mohua also says that she was cornered for speaking on the Adani issue, even before the Hindon Berg report came out in January this year. She kept demanding an investigation into Adani group companies. In February 2023, she gave another speech in the Parliament which went viral. Without taking the name of Adani, she said in the speech that I am a member of the country. I want to talk about the most famous man who is not the Prime Minister. This is the man whose name starts with A and ends with I.
Prime Minister Mr. Of India. That’s The Heist And The Abuse. You Will Go To Her Single Woman MP Into Shutting Her Into Submission. Tomorrow The CBI Will Be Sent To My House. I’m Sure They Will Harass Me For The Next Six Months. But I Would Like To Ask,
What About The 13000 Crore Coal Scam Of Mr. Adani?
That The CPI And The ED Have Not Found Places to Look at. You Tell I have compromised national security with a login portal. Mr. Adani is buying all our ports and all our airports and his shareholder’s foreign professional investors. The Ministry of Home Affairs Is Giving Them Clearance to Buy All Our Infrastructure. The Ethics Committee Has No Power to Expel. You Have Assam The Powers of a Judiciary. A Penalty on Me That You Have No Power to Do Use Every Tenant.
This is the Beginning of Your End. Jab Nash Manush But if there is an umbrella then conscience dies first. We are going to come back and we are going to see the end. Many times during the debate in Lok Sabha, BJP MP Nishikant Dubey and Mahua Moitra came face to face, this happens in parliamentary politics, but no one had thought that its outcome would be like this. Nishikant Dubey is an MP from Godda, Jharkhand. Nishikant Dubey said in one of his allegations that Mohua often questions the Adani Group.
He was also focused on the company against which the Hiranandani Group was bidding for the business. On October 15, Nishikant Dubey wrote a letter to the Ethics Committee and made allegations. It was alleged that Mohua Moitra took money for asking questions in Parliament.
While filing an affidavit by a lawyer named Jai Anant Deha Dai, she alleged that Mahua Moitra took a bribe from Hiranandani Group CEO Darshan Hiranandani to ask questions in Lok Sabha Deha Rai is Moitra’s former partner Was not married, says partner Dubey alleged that 50 out of 60 questions asked by Moitra so far in Lok Sabha Either protecting Nandani’s interests or furthering them, he claimed That the plot involved targeting PM Modi by constantly mentioning the Adani Group gave the impression that she was criticizing the government but possibly did so to get cover for her covert criminal operation.
All this is gone, Nishikant Dubey has written in his allegation. Opposition MPs allege that Hiranandani was not called and asked. Janata Dal United MP Girdhari Lal Yadav said that he too does not know how to operate a computer. His PS fills the question, he cannot learn to operate a computer at this age, but can the same be said for Mahua, she has studied in America and has been a banker. She has also admitted that she gave the login to Heera Nandani but did not take the money. Media Interview He said that all the questions were asked only with my permission.
The placenta is so big and its punishment should be so big.
Has the transaction of money been proved?
The Ethics Committee has said that a government agency should investigate it, but should it not have waited for the agency’s investigation? In 2005, cases of taking money and asking questions. When the case of 10 MPs came up, that case was also expedited, but at that time, not the Ethics Committee, but an ad-hoc committee investigated within 10 days and tabled the report in the House. It was tabled and after the debate the next day, 10 Lok Sabha MPs were expelled. All these MPs also went to the court but lost their case there. Former General Secretary of Lok Sabha PDT
Acharya has written in his article in the Hindu newspaper that this matter cannot be dealt with by the Ethics Committee. The matter of asking questions for taking money is always referred to the Privileges Committee. This committee after proper investigation recommends action against the MP. presents its findings in a report if the parliamentary If a transaction of money for the transaction of business is proven then the MP can also be expelled from the House. There have been instances in the Lok Sabha where MPs have been expelled from the House on the ground that taking bribes is a crime hence it needs to be investigated.
The agency should investigate criminal cases. Parliamentary committees cannot conduct criminal investigations. The MPs were expelled from the Lok Sabha in 2005. They are still facing trial under the Prevention of Corruption Act. As a private citizen, my partner with wild intentions masks a common citizen in front of the committee. The testimony has been used and we there in polar positions to each other. The complaint says, I accepted cash and consideration from a Businessman To Ask Questions In Father S Of His Commercial Interest. But The Businessman Suar Moto Affidavit Says I Pressure Him Into Uploading Questions To Further My Agenda.
The Two Are At Polar Opposites. The Ethics Committee Without Getting To The Root Of This Has Decided To Bungle. There Is No Evidence of Any Cash or Any Gifts Anywhere. The Ethics Committee report is 495 pages long. We can’t read it all that fast. Therefore, we will talk about other aspects in the further report. Today Janata Dal United MP Giridhari Lal Yadav said that his PA filled out the questions and did not operate the computer.
After knowing this, the Speaker said that a case could be made against him also, his membership could be lost. It has been told in many media reports that MPs often give login to their colleagues as interns who upload the questions on their behalf. If this is true then what? Many people who made such mistakes like Mahua Moitra were saved, this one. It is a technical matter, is it such a big crime that such a huge punishment should be given, there will be debate on this and also on whether Mahua has been punished for being Mahua.